[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable
From: |
Nick Warne |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:25:55 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9 |
On Sunday 29 January 2006 20:14, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 29 January 2006 13:47, Nick Warne wrote:
> > I reported this once bfore but never could get it to happen again - today
> > it happened again and I saw what causes it.
> >
> > I also upgraded to 1.3.10 today, and get the same result.
>
> could you upload the binary nano somewhere ?
Yep.
http://linicks.net/nano.gz
Nick
--
"Person who say it cannot be done should not interrupt person doing it."
-Chinese Proverb
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, (continued)
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, David Lawrence Ramsey, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/01/30
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Nick Warne, 2006/01/31
Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable, Mike Frysinger, 2006/01/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] Crash report - segfault reproduceable,
Nick Warne <=