nano-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nano-devel] Nano 1.3.8 and 1.3.8-cvs crashes on suse 9.3 x86_64


From: Simon Strandman
Subject: Re: [Nano-devel] Nano 1.3.8 and 1.3.8-cvs crashes on suse 9.3 x86_64
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:44:15 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

David Lawrence Ramsey skrev:


Thanks for the report and the link, in any case.  How does current CVS
behave?  I imagine that renumbering won't be done properly in all cases
due to the above problem, but at least it shouldn't segfault.


It still segfaults. :( This is the new bt:

#0  0x00002aaaaad90253 in malloc_consolidate () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
#1  0x00002aaaaad92002 in _int_malloc () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
#2  0x00002aaaaad93719 in malloc () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
#3  0x0000000000412556 in nmalloc (howmuch=1230) at utils.c:346
#4 0x000000000041443e in statusbar (msg=0x41ac9f "Search Wrapped") at winio.c:2943 #5 0x000000000040e0b0 in findnextstr (can_display_wrap=true, wholeword=false, no_sameline=false, begin=0x710e90, begin_x=6, needle=0x712490 "qwerty", needle_len=0x0) at search.c:362
#6  0x000000000040efe2 in do_search () at search.c:453
#7 0x000000000040c857 in do_input (meta_key=<value optimized out>, func_key=0x7fffffffddbc, s_or_t=0x7fffffffddbd, ran_func=0x7fffffffddbe, finished=0x7fffffffddbf, allow_funcs=true) at nano.c:1679
#8  0x000000000040cd02 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe2f8) at nano.c:2425


--
Simon Strandman <address@hidden>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]