[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] Re: Nano cut/paste bug
From: |
Nick Warne |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] Re: Nano cut/paste bug |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Jun 2005 18:38:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8 |
On Friday 03 June 2005 18:20, David Lawrence Ramsey wrote:
> Ken Tyler wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > Sounds like a bug to me too but as I remember total compatibility with
> > Pico was important even if it resulted in oddities now and then...
>
> I'm trying to keep it as compatible as possible, but I figure that nano
> isn't supposed to be bug-for-bug compatible in all cases, especially
> with some of the weirder bugs.
Hi all,
New guy here :)
I agree with that statement - surely 'compatible' means intended
functionality, not buggy quirks.
BTW, been a fan of nano for ages, and recently started to use 1.3 tree -
excellent work - thank you.
Nick
--
"When you're chewing on life's gristle,
Don't grumble, Give a whistle..."
Re: [Nano-devel] updates (yes, I'm still alive...), David Lawrence Ramsey, 2005/06/15
- Re: [Nano-devel] updates (yes, I'm still alive...), David Benbennick, 2005/06/16
- Re: [Nano-devel] updates (yes, I'm still alive...), David Lawrence Ramsey, 2005/06/21
- Re: [Nano-devel] updates (yes, I'm still alive...), Jordi Mallach, 2005/06/21
- Re: [Nano-devel] updates (yes, I'm still alive...), David Lawrence Ramsey, 2005/06/21
- Re: [Nano-devel] updates (yes, I'm still alive...), Jordi Mallach, 2005/06/21
- Re: [Nano-devel] updates (yes, I'm still alive...), David Lawrence Ramsey, 2005/06/21