[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] Patch Against 1.1.6 for multibuffer "add new file"
From: |
Dwayne Rightler |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] Patch Against 1.1.6 for multibuffer "add new file" |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:30:16 -0600 |
I was planning on applying the technique to both blank buffers and file
buffers.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Lawrence Ramsey" <address@hidden>
To: "Dwayne Rightler" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Nano-devel] Patch Against 1.1.6 for multibuffer "add new file"
> --- Dwayne Rightler <address@hidden> wrote:
> >I could write the code and submit a patch for this if anyone is
interested.
>
> I would be. I have a question, though. Would this new
> saving method only apply to blank buffers, or to all
> buffers? (If it's the latter, the duplicate checking
> functions could be completely removed, and
> get_full_path() would no longer have to be compiled in
> when using multibuffers, since it's only used in those
> functions; both of these would save some major space in
> the binary.)
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________
> Sluggy.Net: The Sluggy Freelance Community!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nano-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nano-devel
>