[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nano-devel] My good buddy Uriah
From: |
Steven Kneizys |
Subject: |
[Nano-devel] My good buddy Uriah |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Feb 2002 16:17:44 -0800 (PST) |
As I was looking at the code lookin for leaks, I notced the
multibuffers keep getting copied in and out of 'fileage'. I was
thinking it would be less fragmentary on the heap and less CPU
instensive, etc., to just have fileage point the the current buffer in
"open_files". Switching would just require changing the pointer
instead of copying the data back, and the heap would be happier.
Switching between large files would be a snap. Is there a reason not
to do it that way? Just thinking out loud :)
Steve...
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com