[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] serialization format
From: |
Markus Wanner |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] serialization format |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Apr 2016 19:35:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 |
Hello Stephen,
thanks for your feedback.
On 04/04/2016 06:58 PM, Stephen Leake wrote:
> Human readable makes testing and developing new features much easier. If
> we use binary, we will need a separate tool that translates that to
> readable, which is then another source of bugs (or the same source, just
> in a different place).
Yeah, that's a point. However, I'd also argue that we should target the
user and not the developer. And from a user's perspective, isn't
monotone the very tool that does that kind of translation?
Or put another way: Do *users* really care what serialization format
monotone uses underneath?
Regards
Markus Wanner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Monotone-devel] serialization format, Markus Wanner, 2016/04/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] serialization format, Stephen Leake, 2016/04/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] serialization format,
Markus Wanner <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] serialization format, Stephen Leake, 2016/04/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] serialization format, Ludovic Brenta, 2016/04/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] serialization format, Markus Wanner, 2016/04/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] serialization format, J Decker, 2016/04/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] serialization format, J Decker, 2016/04/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] serialization format, Markus Wanner, 2016/04/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] serialization format, Markus Wanner, 2016/04/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] serialization format, Hendrik Boom, 2016/04/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] serialization format, Markus Wanner, 2016/04/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] serialization format, Peter Stirling, 2016/04/07