[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Thanks. Re: nested workspaces
From: |
Stephen Leake |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Thanks. Re: nested workspaces |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 14:16:17 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) |
Hendrik Boom <address@hidden> writes:
>> But it's better to checkout the two projects in parallel; there's no
>> reason the directory structure has to match the main/sub project
>> structure.
>
> Well, actually, there is.
>
> I'm writing stories. Some are short, some are long and end up
> organised into many files. Each story, once it's well-enough conceived
> to be considered a story, ends up being a separate (sub)project.
Ok.
> But there's also prewriting, where ideas and text fragments are thrown
> about long before there's any pretense of them being stories. These
> get looked through now and then, and sometimes they, in various
> combinations, become stories of their own. Whrn that happens, I make a
> subdirectory to isolate them from the general chaos and make a
> concentrated place to work on them.
Why is that new directory under some other story, rather than at the
"stories" root level?
> So each story's main directory is checked into a monotone branch of its
> own, so its further revision history doesn't get mixed with the
> completely different revision history of other, irrelevant stories.
Right. So why are new ones not like that?
> But the main directory, that contains all these subproject workspaces,
> is where all the initial inchoate thoughts are conceived and stored, as
> well as README files explaining the organisation that does exist, and
> various scripts that manage the whole thing.
The directory for inchoate thoughts should be in parallel to the
stand-alone stories:
stories
inchoate
story_1
story_2
> And it's all wrapped up in one big directory for convenience, to
> separate it from other things that have nothing to do with story
> writing.
See above; no problem
> The main directory is the natural place to put the idea soup that
> hasn't crystallized into specific projects yet.
That's not "natural" to me.
But I'm glad monotone can work for you :).
--
-- Stephe