[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone
From: |
Hendrik Boom |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone |
Date: |
Sat, 21 May 2011 11:09:03 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 07:18:21PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Hendrik Boom <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> Switching to GPL3 would make us license-incompatible with a large body
> >> of code (everything under a copyleft that isn't v3-compatible, in
> >> particular, code under v2-only). It would also make us
> >> license-compatible with a large body of code (anything that adds
> >> restrictions that are okay with v3 but not v2).
> >
> > GLP2+ is compatible with GPL2.
> > GLP2+ is compatible with GPL3.
>
> I said v2-only.
Yes, we're in agreement. The v2-only item was at the end of my first
sentence. The mtn code should be GPL2+, mentioned at the start of both
sentences.
Sorry if that wasn't clear.
-- hendrik
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Stephen Leake, 2011/05/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Hendrik Boom, 2011/05/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Stephen Leake, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Zack Weinberg, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Hendrik Boom, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Zack Weinberg, 2011/05/20
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone,
Hendrik Boom <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Zack Weinberg, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Richard Levitte, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Stephen Leake, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Ludovic Brenta, 2011/05/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] GPLv3 code in monotone, Zack Weinberg, 2011/05/21