[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: OpenEmbedded looking to jump ship
From: |
Bruce Stephens |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: OpenEmbedded looking to jump ship |
Date: |
Thu, 01 May 2008 22:59:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
"Justin Patrin" <address@hidden> writes:
> It seems that some of the folks at OpenEmbedded are now grumbling
> about use of monotone again and that some of our key developers are
> looking to switch to something else (hg or git)[1]. The main point
> of contention seems to revolve around, as we've seem lately on this
> list, getting rid of revisions. In this particular case a revision
> had been distributed that made unwanted changes. It was a head
> revision and was suspended by a developer but other developers who
> had versions of monotone prior to the suspend functionality blindly
> merged it with their code, causing a chain of suspensions/removals
> that was eventually fixed with a reverse patch.
So how, concretely, would this have played out better had OpenEmbedded
been using either hg or git?
[...]
- [Monotone-devel] OpenEmbedded looking to jump ship, Justin Patrin, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Monotone-devel] OpenEmbedded looking to jump ship, Christof Petig, 2008/05/01
- [Monotone-devel] Re: OpenEmbedded looking to jump ship,
Bruce Stephens <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: OpenEmbedded looking to jump ship, Justin Patrin, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: OpenEmbedded looking to jump ship, Stephen Leake, 2008/05/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: OpenEmbedded looking to jump ship, Justin Patrin, 2008/05/03
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: OpenEmbedded looking to jump ship, Stephen Leake, 2008/05/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: OpenEmbedded looking to jump ship, Stephen Leake, 2008/05/04
- [Monotone-devel] Re: OpenEmbedded looking to jump ship, Holger Freyther, 2008/05/04