[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] RFC: 'suspend' certs
From: |
William Uther |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] RFC: 'suspend' certs |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Jul 2007 13:35:07 -0700 |
On 07/07/2007, at 12:10 PM, Richard Levitte wrote:
willu.mailingLists> ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Color_of_the_bikeshed )
It should be clear by now that the bikeshed must be colored violet
with pink dots.
Green!
On 07/07/2007, at 12:02 PM, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
Shouldn't it then be "suspended" instead of "suspend"?
The name of the cert is irrelevant as the user never sees it. The
name of the command should be "suspend" because it is a command, not
a description of the state of the branch.
On 07/07/2007, at 12:10 PM, Richard Levitte wrote:
Only one, really: how do we handle irresponsable usage of that cert.
I would normally expect developers to be responsable (and I'm sure
there are a few laughing at this point ;-)), but I can also imagine
cases when developers become childish over issues and could go into a
suspend war. Should we care?
Normal mechanisms apply. In particular, you can personally choose
not to trust certs by a particular developer.
Will :-}