Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: po/ChangeLog

[Nathaniel Smith]

On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 11:17:04AM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> I'd almost think so too, but any output massaging probably wouldn't be
> entirely portable. Then there's also the issue of, what if you don't
> want every single rev to get a changelog entry? Things like translation
> updates, or feature branches that should have one entry at the end when
> they're merged, rather than 10 "implemented X" and 50 "checkpoint;
> 243/371 tests pass now" entries.

log --exclude po --stay-on-branch ?

-- Nathaniel

-- 
"But suppose I am not willing to claim that.  For in fact pianos
are heavy, and very few persons can carry a piano all by themselves."