[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] A vote for propagation (debian branch)
From: |
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] A vote for propagation (debian branch) |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Jun 2006 10:07:08 +0200 (CEST) |
In message <address@hidden> on Thu, 1 Jun 2006 14:40:54 -0700, Nathaniel Smith
<address@hidden> said:
njs> On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 02:09:44PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
wrote:
njs> > I've been running a server as well as my local client using the
njs> > nvm.debian branch. As far as I can tell, it works without flaw.
njs> >
njs> > So I wonder, is there any reason not to propagate the changes
njs> > in that branch back to nvm? If need be, that propagation has
njs> > my vote!
njs>
njs> Do we have a debian maintainer right now? This seems like their
njs> decision to make.
I'm not sure I agree. We have most obviously chosen (well, I should
say "you" because that was already in place before my time) to support
Debian packaging, simply by starting the debian/ subdirectory and fill
it with the right files. As a related thing, who's making decisions
regarding monotone.spec?
But it matters little, really, as long as *someone* decides. I would
hate for it to end up with us and Debian pointing at each other and
saying "It's your decision" in chorus. I much prefer to be pro-
active in this matter. Therefore, I speak up.
It seems like Tomas Fasth came back into the game recently. Tomas,
are you with us? Ya got anything to say?
Cheers,
Richard
--
Richard Levitte address@hidden
http://richard.levitte.org/
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
-- C.S. Lewis