[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux
From: |
Nathaniel Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Dec 2004 11:22:52 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 06:13:59PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> In message <address@hidden> on Tue, 7 Dec 2004 07:25:54 -0800 (PST), Logan
> Sackette <address@hidden> said:
> lsackette> diff blah.c/my_branch/3 blah.c/your_branch/latest
>
> I'm sorry, but *GAH!* Is that how it looks working with CC? What if
> I want to make the difference between the file foo/bar/1 and
> bar/foo/3, are those considered files with numeric names inside two
> sub-levels of directories, or version 1 of the file foo in branch bar
> and version 3 of the file bar in branch foo?
In ClearCase your question is meaningless; or rather, the answer to
both is "yes". ClearCase works as a magic filesystem; that example
shows the standard Unix diff(1) command being applied to two real Unix
files, that happen to be inside two levels of subdirectory of the file
'blah.c' (yes, files can have subdirectories, whee) in your checkout.
It's an interesting approach, at least :-) I think I like the 'simple'
part of Monotone, though...
(.sig is random, yet apropos...)
-- Nathaniel
--
The best book on programming is still Strunk and White.
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, derek, 2004/12/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Nathaniel Smith, 2004/12/08
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2004/12/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Oren Ben-Kiki, 2004/12/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Nathaniel Smith, 2004/12/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Oren Ben-Kiki, 2004/12/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Jerome Fisher, 2004/12/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Nathaniel Smith, 2004/12/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Jerome Fisher, 2004/12/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Zack Weinberg, 2004/12/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux,
Nathaniel Smith <=
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, John S. Yates, Jr., 2004/12/07
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Nathaniel Smith, 2004/12/07
- [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, graydon hoare, 2004/12/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Emile Snyder, 2004/12/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Kevin Smith, 2004/12/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Julian Seward, 2004/12/08
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Joel Reed, 2004/12/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] user-friendly hash formats, redux, Florian Weimer, 2004/12/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] user-friendly hash formats, redux, Nathan Myers, 2004/12/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Few remarks, Derek Scherger, 2004/12/02