[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Few remarks
From: |
Jérôme Marant |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Few remarks |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Dec 2004 16:10:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 |
Quoting Christof Petig <address@hidden>:
> Most likely you are looking for something like this:
>
> USAGE:
> $ g++ monoshort.cc -o monoshort
> $ ./monoshort "monotone --db /some/path/monotone.db" > short.sed
>
> $ monotone log | sed --file short.sed | less
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Version: 2e0
> Author: address@hidden
> Date: 2004-11-20T15:58:05
> ChangeLog:
> [...]
> $ monotone complete revision 2e0
> 2e0d044463ade95d106611197c09ce5c35cbfcee
>
> Ancestry trees get quite readable with this script. (updated version to
> accomodate recent changes in 0.15)
>From a user POV, it makes things shorter so you don't necessarily
have to cut and paste IDs.
However, it is still not userfriendly enough IMHO: it is hard to
figure out relationships from one cset to another.
For instance: 2e0 -> 1af -> f09
Regards,
--
Jérôme Marant
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Nathaniel Smith, 2004/12/07
- [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, graydon hoare, 2004/12/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Emile Snyder, 2004/12/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Kevin Smith, 2004/12/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Julian Seward, 2004/12/08
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: user-friendly hash formats, redux, Joel Reed, 2004/12/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] user-friendly hash formats, redux, Florian Weimer, 2004/12/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] user-friendly hash formats, redux, Nathan Myers, 2004/12/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Few remarks, Derek Scherger, 2004/12/02
Re: [Monotone-devel] Few remarks, Christof Petig, 2004/12/02
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Few remarks,
Jérôme Marant <=