[Monotone-devel] Re: using sqlite as provided in debian unstable

[Bruce Stephens]

Tomas Fasth <address@hidden> writes:

[...]

> In debian the principle of sharing code (most often as libraries)
> are very refined. In debian unstable, boost and sqlite for example
> are maintained as separate packages, boost as version 1.31.0 and
> sqlite as version 2.8.15. Graydon's debian package already use boost
> as provided in debian unstable, but what about sqlite? Can you, my
> fellow developers, see any forseeable problem if monotone is built
> using the debian version of sqlite?

monotone uses an 8K page size, whereas sqlite 2.8.15 uses a 1K one.  I
don't know exactly what implications that difference has---presumably
performance.  If I understand things correctly, this difference will
disappear with sqlite 3, but that may not arrive for a while.

[...]