[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-debian] RFS: monotone-1.0-7
From: |
Markus Wanner |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-debian] RFS: monotone-1.0-7 |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:31:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 |
On 03/25/2013 10:42 PM, Markus Wanner wrote:
> For amd64 - Debian GNU/Linux - sid (under chroot), I get a single
> failing test in the extra suite, though (bash_completion). The error
> message: "expect: pty_termios: system configuration problem: ttyname()
> failed: Bad file descriptor" seems to indicate a chroot setup issue,
> rather than a mtn one, though.
Confirmed. Binding all of /dev, /dev/pts, /proc and /sys on the chroot
makes the test pass as well.
So the set of combinations working for me is:
i686 - Debian GNU/Linux - sid (under pbuilder)
amd64 - Debian GNU/Linux - sid (under chroot)
i686 - Debian GNU/Hurd - sid
arm5tel - Debian GNU/Linux - wheezy
A `./mtn version --full` on the amd64 / sid / chroot build looks like this:
> $ ./mtn version --full
> monotone 1.0 (base revision: a7c3a1d9de1ba7a62c9dd9efee17252234bb502c)
> Running on : Linux 3.8.2-argodan #3 SMP PREEMPT Mon Mar 4 10:30:13
> CET 2013 x86_64
> C++ compiler : GNU C++ version 4.7.2
> C++ standard library: GNU libstdc++ version 20120920
> Boost version : 1_49
> SQLite version : 3.7.15.2 (compiled against 3.7.15.2)
> Lua version : Lua 5.1
> PCRE version : 8.31 2012-07-06 (compiled against 8.31)
> Botan version : 1.10.5 (compiled against 1.10.5)
Maybe you compiled against different library versions and we have a
regression there? None of the above tests were building against
libbotan1.8, for example.
Regards
Markus Wanner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature