[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Performing an action only after X failures
|
From: |
Jan-Henrik Haukeland |
|
Subject: |
Re: Performing an action only after X failures |
|
Date: |
Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:04:08 +0100 |
On Dec 26, 2004, at 21:26, Martin Pala wrote:
In the case that it will be general, it can allow to stack the rules
and provide error level dependant actions, such as for example:
# if <X> <EVENT> within <Y> cycles then <ACTION>
where:
... <X> = number of event occurences
... <EVENT> = event type
... <Y> = number of consequent cycles
... <ACTION> = given action (alert|restart|unmonitor|exec|...)
I'm +1 to add such feature. What do developers and users think about
it?
I'm +1. If implemented then I think we can remove the every-statement?
--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland
--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland
Mobil +47 97141255