Re: Apache, rotatelogs & chroot environment

[Marco Ermini]

I will think that "apache-status" would be a better and more
significant protocol name. Apache may be tested in other ways, i.e.
mod-watch is quite used - in a future, someone may want to create an
"apache-mod-watch" test or something similar.

Just my 5 cents.... :-)


Regards.


On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 14:10:24 +0100, Jan-Henrik Haukeland
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I agree with Martin, this looks useful, but must be placed in it's own
> apache protocol test with a corresponding APACHE (status) keyword.
> There should also be a way to specify the log-process limit in the
> control file. Finally the patch need to conform C89 and define
> variables at the top of the function. I don't think monit should be
> C-99 just yet :)
> 
> If this is fixed I'm also +1 for adding this patch.
[...]
-- 
Marco Ermini
http://www.markoer.org
Dubium sapientiae initium. (Descartes)
address@hidden # mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research
<< This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.
Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. >>