Re: patch for parsing of arguments used in the start start/stop programs modification

[Martin Pala]

Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:
> Martin Pala <address@hidden> writes:
>
>
> > If argument blocks should be supported (and i think they should :)
> > submitted patch wouldn't be satisfaction for it => more extended
> > refactoring will be needed. If the new parser wouldn't be done until
> > new (patch) release, we can maybe use submitted patch, while it is bit
> > better than present parser
>
>
> Yep, absolutely. And it just hit me, maybe we can use the the parser
> and lexer (p.y/l.l) to split the arguments correctly?
>
> I'm just sketching here (and we must redefine PATH a bit a suchs):
>
> start           : START '"' PATH argumentlist '"';
> start           : START PATH;
>
> argumentlist    : argument
>                 | argumentlist argument
>                 ;
>
> argument        : STRING { addargument($1); }
>                 | BLOCK  { addargument($1); }
>                 and so on..

Yeah, i think that we can use this way :)

Martin