Hi,
Is there anything we could do to get it to the 5.3 version?
If not, when is the version after it planned?
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 00:04:52 +0200
From: Jan-Henrik Haukeland
To: The monit developer list <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [monit-dev] Settle feature
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Thank you very much. This looks useful. We are about to release a new version of Monit which changes every a bit, but it should not be too problematic to include this patch. We'll see if we can include this in later versions, not the upcoming 5.3 though.
Jan-Henrik
On Sep 1, 2011, at 6:54 PM, David Kohen wrote:
> Hello,
> Although you recommended to ask before developing a feature, but we really need it, so I developed it anyway.
>
> I call this feature settle, it's purpose is to allow a daemon to settle before it is monitored, it is mutually exclusive with "every" (not by definition, but in practice).
> It uses the same syntax as "every" and to make it work I changed the behaviour of verify to check the monitor state and make it MONITOR_YES only in the next cycle.
>
> We'd really love it if this feature will be integrated in your tree, as we're going to use it quite often.
>
> BTW, the latest tree doesn't build due to a missing header, probably residue from libmonit.
> Thanks,
>
> --
>
> David Kohen
> Waze IFS team.
--
David Kohen
Waze IFS team.