Re: event ratio patch updated

[Jan-Henrik Haukeland]

I have only browsed through the patch and it looks fine by me,  
although I'm not quite sure what is going on with the Event.state_map  
bit-flicking :-) Since you use a long long (could uint64_t be used  
instead?) does this mean that there are only room for 64 failed/ 
passed events? It should be more than enough but should maybe be  
documented (if I'm right). Anyway here's my +1 for accepting the patch.


On 2. sep. 2005, at 23.02, Martin Pala wrote:

> Argh!!! Fixed attachment - it contained the vi swap ... sorry, i  
> definitely need some sleep :)
>
>
> Martin Pala wrote:
>
> > Ugh ... forgotten attachment
> > Martin Pala wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > here is the event ratio patch updated for current cvs version and  
> > > extended by the documentation.
> > >
> > > May i sync it to cvs?
> > >
> > > Martin
>
>
> <event_ratio_20050902.patch>
> _______________________________________________
> monit-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-dev

--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland
Mobil +47 97141255

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature