monit-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?


From: Christian Hopp
Subject: Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 12:06:08 +0100 (CET)

On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Martin Pala wrote:

> You are right Christian - the result of the election was realy strange
> :) I'm neutral in this question not because of try to make pleasure for
> someone, but just because i'm not against it as well as i don't think
> that it is 'must have' feature.
>
> Probably Jan's decision is good conclusion for the election - we have 4
> votes => (0+0+0+1)/4 = 1/4 which is too low for change. What about take
> care about elections so, that the quotient of the election which equals
> to votes_summary/electors_count must be >=0.5 to succeed? In can solve
> similar situations well.
>
> Martin

Or we do it like it like the jakarta voting.  We say we need at least
two "+1" votes and more "+1" votes then "-1" votes.  And for major
decisions we need at least two "+1" votes and no "-1" votes.

Christian


-- 
Christian Hopp                                email: address@hidden
Institut für Elektrische Informationstechnik             fon: +49-5323-72-2113
TU Clausthal, Leibnizstr. 28, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerf.   fax: +49-5323-72-3197
                             pgpkey: https://www.iei.tu-clausthal.de/pgp-keys/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]