[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mldonkey-users] Newest updates, what has changed?
From: |
Martin |
Subject: |
Re: [Mldonkey-users] Newest updates, what has changed? |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:34:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt |
MLdonkey wrote...
> > 900 has been commented... I thought it was a good idea, but yes, it
> is probably better not to play with queue ranks...
...and there is surely a better usage for that bandwidth.
IMHO:
- This should not be named *banned* - we didn ban them - we just
thouht that it makes no sense to enter their queue!
- This is a very good feature
- The value should be configurable - not hardcoded
Question:
- What happens with a new release (with just a few full sources) and
surely no chance to get a queue position <900
--
Before replying see www.reedmedia.net/misc/mail/using-mailing-list.html
BOFH excuse : Zombie processes detected, machine is haunted.