mldonkey-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Mldonkey-users] Lots of "virtual" clients ?


From: Lionel Bouton
Subject: [Mldonkey-users] Lots of "virtual" clients ?
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 01:30:20 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212

Let's start by this output :

Eval command: cs

Uptime: 170980 seconds (1+23:29)
  Client   | Seen     | Dl (Mb, Kb/s, %) | Ul (Mb, Kb/s, %) |  Banned
------------+----------+------------------+------------------+----------
Total       |263926     | 4894.1  29.3     | 1147.2   6.9     | 191   0%
eDonkey     | 6070   2%|    4.7   0.0   0%|   52.2   0.3   5%|   0   0%
old mldonkey|13264   5%|   52.6   0.3   1%|   24.7   0.1   2%|  89   1%
new mldonkey|200610  76%|  354.5   2.1   7%|  337.5   2.0  29%|  76   0%
Overnet     |26434  10%| 4385.4  26.3  90%|  451.8   2.7  39%|   1   0%
old eMule   |    1   0%|    0.0   0.0   0%|    0.0   0.0   0%|   0   0%
new eMule   |17547   7%|   96.9   0.6   2%|  281.1   1.7  25%|  25   0%
server      |    0   0%|    0.0   0.0   0%|    0.0   0.0   0%|   0 nan%

I'm using 2.02+pango from mldonkeyworld

In 2 days, is it considered normal to see 200000 different "new mldonkey/emule mods" edonkey peers ? Looking at my downloads' sources, some of the downloads have the very same nickname listed dozens of times. I suspect some peers may answer each request/make requests with different client's MD4s (circumventing aggressive behavior banning rules maybe). Before, auto_max_sources_per_file = true gave me 60-80 sources per file. Now mldonkey looks for 1000... apparently it easily finds new buggy ones :-(

Download and upload rate are (still?) fine, but the CPU usage is going through the roof (40% on an AthlonXP 1700+ !), maybe looking into such a large peer list begins to be really costly.

LB.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]