[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Mldonkey-users] Lots of "virtual" clients ?
From: |
Lionel Bouton |
Subject: |
[Mldonkey-users] Lots of "virtual" clients ? |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jan 2003 01:30:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212 |
Let's start by this output :
Eval command: cs
Uptime: 170980 seconds (1+23:29)
Client | Seen | Dl (Mb, Kb/s, %) | Ul (Mb, Kb/s, %) | Banned
------------+----------+------------------+------------------+----------
Total |263926 | 4894.1 29.3 | 1147.2 6.9 | 191 0%
eDonkey | 6070 2%| 4.7 0.0 0%| 52.2 0.3 5%| 0 0%
old mldonkey|13264 5%| 52.6 0.3 1%| 24.7 0.1 2%| 89 1%
new mldonkey|200610 76%| 354.5 2.1 7%| 337.5 2.0 29%| 76 0%
Overnet |26434 10%| 4385.4 26.3 90%| 451.8 2.7 39%| 1 0%
old eMule | 1 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0 0%
new eMule |17547 7%| 96.9 0.6 2%| 281.1 1.7 25%| 25 0%
server | 0 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0.0 0.0 0%| 0 nan%
I'm using 2.02+pango from mldonkeyworld
In 2 days, is it considered normal to see 200000 different "new
mldonkey/emule mods" edonkey peers ?
Looking at my downloads' sources, some of the downloads have the very
same nickname listed dozens of times.
I suspect some peers may answer each request/make requests with
different client's MD4s (circumventing aggressive behavior banning rules
maybe).
Before, auto_max_sources_per_file = true gave me 60-80 sources per file.
Now mldonkey looks for 1000... apparently it easily finds new buggy
ones :-(
Download and upload rate are (still?) fine, but the CPU usage is going
through the roof (40% on an AthlonXP 1700+ !), maybe looking into such a
large peer list begins to be really costly.
LB.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Mldonkey-users] Lots of "virtual" clients ?,
Lionel Bouton <=