[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Mldonkey-users] Re: Which version?
From: |
Sven Hartge |
Subject: |
[Mldonkey-users] Re: Which version? |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Jan 2003 19:04:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
tin/1.5.16-20030113 ("Spiders") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.20-112 (i586)) |
Martin <address@hidden> wrote:
> Sven Hartge wrote...
>> Sergio Bayarri Gausi <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> So my question is... Should I stay with my 2.02-2 version? Is it safe
>>> to upgrade to 2.02-5? Would it be better to upgrade only to 2.02-4 and
>>> wait for Simon & co to release 2.02-6?
>> I'd stay at 2.02-2, if this version works for you.
> At least *try* 2.02-5...it works great for me ATM! If you find out
> 2.02-2 works better for you - stay with it. (back it up)
> BTW: loosing incomplete chunks on restart isnt so bad....how often
> does this happen? One a week? (update to new versions only of course!)
Well, I shut down the computer running the mldonkey every night (my
machines are way to loud, and I am to lazy to build a water cooling
system).
And because I download some very rare files, where I barely get one
chunk per day, losing the bytes gathered is really painful for me.
This is why I backed out all the changes concerning the new MD4 handling
and kept only the ones for the GUI and the sources management.
S°
--
142 Reasons, Why You Can't Find Your System Administrator
94. Sysadmin's down in the administrative offices fixing one of their
DOS boxes.