[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey
From: |
Ultimateclem |
Subject: |
Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 23:22:32 +0100 |
Le Mardi 7 Janvier 2003 21:29, Jochen Radmacher a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Roland Arendes wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > FYI
> >
> > --
> > Added MLDonkey to the statistic
> >
> > MLDonkey Emulation
> > MLDonkey is very unfair against eMule users. It allows only one third of
> > the uploadqueue to beoccupied by eMule clients.
>
> We need something that does not favor one particular client, or we will
> always see such mods...
> How about making the distribution dynamic, dependend on " seen" or
> "downloaded" in the statistic. If the download comes mainly from one
> client Type, even it is emule( i doubt that...), this type of client
> should get the most upload.
If I summarize all was said about emule against mldonkey : we have a problem
of leeching. I do not think that mld wants to favor one or the other client
in particular, but mld, in general, download from other clients to give to
emule.
I agree to the idea of a distribution of upload slots proportionaly to the
downloads, in theory, this is perfect to avoid leeching. But in practice I'm
afraid this will reduce the bandwith of the upload (so the download bandwith
for the peers)... I prefer to leech than to see my upload speed reduced (want
to favorise the download of the others, hoping that the others will do the
same). That's my opinion.
>
> > Additionally it favourises MLDonkey by giving
> > them always a slot.
>
> That's not good Style.
> The only ones who should always have a slot are my Friends!
:-)
>
> > In drder not to have this disadvantage MavMule emulates a MLDonkey client
> > when he connects
> > to an MLDonkey client.
>
> That raises one Question: Who is the first client that says: Im a
> [emule/mldonkey]-client? If it is the connecting client, we could "play
> emule" in that case. But this should only be a temporary fix...
arf. I can imagine funny situations...
>
> Jochen
>
Well, this message is the first I've seen in this list about a "cooperation"
between mld and emule... I don't know if I have to be hapy for this first
step or disappointed by the way engaged....
- [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Roland Arendes, 2003/01/07
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Jochen Radmacher, 2003/01/07
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey,
Ultimateclem <=
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Goswin Brederlow, 2003/01/07
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Stephane Goulet, 2003/01/07
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Roland Arendes, 2003/01/08
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Goswin Brederlow, 2003/01/08
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Manu Bork, 2003/01/08
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Roland Arendes, 2003/01/08
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, MLdonkey, 2003/01/09
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Michael Panteleit, 2003/01/09