[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mldonkey-users] New source management
From: |
Martin |
Subject: |
Re: [Mldonkey-users] New source management |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 22:30:42 +0100 |
Goswin Brederlow wrote...again pretty much....
> wh <address@hidden> writes:
> > Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > >Lets throw in my 2 c of thougths:
> I know that anything *.dip.t-dialin.net is a dynamic IP. Its slow and
> it has a short lifetime. If I just found that source and a connect
> fails the source should be blacklisted for the next few hours. No
> sense trying it again. The user has gone offline or gotten a new ip.
whoa...one ste to far there...knowing its a *.dip.t-dialin.net needs a
dns-lookup! (which has to be done for all sources!)
If you look at your stats you see 3k+ sources in less that 2 hours!
this is a real bandwidth-killer!
> Ips not in that range are to be prefered. More important than an
> initial penalty is getting rid of those IPs once they fail to
> work. Its a waste of my bandwith trying and anoying to the next person
> getting that ip (unless hes a donkey user too :).
You would spend the bandwidth you saved with that on dns...
So i guess ip-ranges should be the better way...its not that difficult
to find the ip-ranges for most dialup-isps...
> > >Additionally I think the penalty for a connection failure for known
> > >dynamic IPs should be very high. Its quite unlikely that a dialin user
Guess you didnt know that but most of the donkey clients run on
dynamic ips....static ips are the minority...
> > >has its donkey down for an hour and the start it up again. Its far
> > >more likely he got a new IP.
Thats for sure...if hes offline the changes that he gets a new ip are
very high!
> A known dynamic IP thats older than 24h (or whatever the known
> turnaround time for that range is) should be disgarded. No sense
> trying to reach a *.dip.t-dialin.net client 24h since the ISP does a
> disconnect and new IP every 24h.
Ok. but 24 hours is not the standart worldwide....some countries
disconnect after 12 hours....
> > How does emule banning work? Does it ban for too frequently asking
> > sources at all or does it ban for too frequently asking per source
> No clue.
>From the mldonkey source:
- If a client asks for a file more often than 590 seconds, ie 10
minutes, it gets a BAD REQUEST
- If a client has 2 BAD REQUESTS, it get banned !
> Shouldn't overnet upload work in todays CVS + pango?
It does in current cvs - cant tell about the pango patches...
> What are those 81 banned? Did I bann them? Did they ban me?
No. You mldonkey did ban them ;)
Those emules were probably patched or misconfigured and had to be banned!
--
Before replying see www.reedmedia.net/misc/mail/using-mailing-list.html
Captain Kirk, meet my father. He's Dad, Jim.
[Mldonkey-users] Re: new source management, Sven Hartge, 2003/01/13