[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mingw-cross-env-list] Did unsupported/win32-g++-cross/qmake.conf ch
From: |
René Berber |
Subject: |
Re: [Mingw-cross-env-list] Did unsupported/win32-g++-cross/qmake.conf change? |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:29:00 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 |
On 24 Sep 2011 09:47:07, Mark Brand wrote:
> These changes come from the regular win32-g++ Qt mkspec. Here is the commit:
>
> commit 0c4ed66e87ef6f76d5b0d67905b587c31ad03a18
> Author: Darryl L. Miles <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu Mar 31 11:16:50 2011 +0200
>
> Remove useless LFLAGS
>
> These options were found to be no longer required for MinGW releases at
> this time (they are also never valid for MinGW64 when building 64bit).
>
> They actually never worked anyway, as the GNU toolchain linker option
> "-enable-stdcall-fixup" actually means "-e" "nable-stdcall-fixup".
>
> Merge-request: 1158
> Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <address@hidden>
I would say this is a bad joke, if it wasn't real.
Why does D.L. Miles think that -enable-stdcall-fixup actually is a -e
...? The documentation is clear:
http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.21/ld/Options.html#Options
(section 2.1.1) but these guys probably don't read it.
Should I complain upstream then? I guess so.
But what is going on here? who is D.L. Miles and why is he changing the
win32-g++-cross files? Aren't these files an addition made by this project?
--
René Berber
- Re: [Mingw-cross-env-list] Did unsupported/win32-g++-cross/qmake.conf change?,
René Berber <=