|
From: | Mark Brand |
Subject: | Re: [Mingw-cross-env-list] Switch from i386 to i686? |
Date: | Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:29:32 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090720 SUSE/2.0b2-1.1 SeaMonkey/2.0b2 |
As nobody reported a demand for pre-i686 compatibility, I updated the project's target triplet to i686-pc-mingw32. http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/mingw-cross-env/rev/7529d9e111fe
There was an official sounding recommendation from the Mingw-users list on 24/9 to use simply "mingw32" as the prefix.
The official view of the MinGW project, (and this is an authoritative observation), is that the OS identifier shouldbe specified *exactly* as `mingw32'.
(If you want to read the context, I forwarded the complete post to this list on 24/9.)
What do you think about this? Does including "i686" in the prefix actually cause i686 optimizations to be used? I used to assume it did, but now I wonder.
-Mark
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |