Re: license question

[Eric Blake]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Gary V. Vaughan on 8/4/2007 1:38 PM:
> Hi Eric,

Hi Gary,

> 
> Sorry for the late reply.

That's fine.

> 
> On Jul 25, 2007, at 12:04 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> While cleaning up the GPLv3 update, I noticed that CVS Head currently has
>> m4/COPYING.LIB with LGPL 2.1, inserted in 2000 by Gary.  But nothing in
>> CVS mentions being licensed under LGPL.  Now that LGPLv3 is available,
>> there's even less reason to refer to LGPL 2.1 in CVS.  I'm thinking the
>> best thing to do is just remove COPYING.LIB, but I wanted to make sure
>> before doing it.
> 
> IIRC (and memory does get a little hazy after 7 years!), I was thinking of
> shipping libm4 under LGPL at the time.  I'm not especially attached to that
> idea though, so feel free to remove if you'd like.

OK, I'm removing it for now, particularly since libm4 currently pulls in
some GPL-only files from gnulib.

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGtON584KuGfSFAYARAu2ZAJ9M8F/4NfRG6lTAIpIsQAmERsXfLQCfXFtf
FGghD8WfNL20ptr6D5dnyAY=
=qTe+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----