[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lynx-dev] Getting the "Forbidden" error message

From: Stefan Caunter
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] Getting the "Forbidden" error message
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 13:24:41 -0400

News to me.

Are you saying that lynx over https cannot talk to gmail?


Lynx Version 2.8.9dev.3 (05 Jan 2015)
libwww-FM 2.14, SSL-MM 1.4.1, OpenSSL 1.0.1j, ncurses 5.9.20110404
Built on darwin13.4.0 Jan  5 2015 21:06:25

gmail loads basic html version just fine for a gmail account, see
header from logged in session

HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Security-Policy: script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'
'unsafe-eval' 'nonce-ZJsmcZTNYUBsA/VEKdc6UwT/3LE'
om;frame-src 'self';object-src 'none';report-uri
Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store, max-age=0, must-revalidate
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: Fri, 01 Jan 1990 00:00:00 GMT
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 17:22:10 GMT
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN
X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
Content-Length: 0
Server: GSE
Set-Cookie: GMAIL_ZY=e; Path=/mail/u/0; Secure; HttpOnly
Alternate-Protocol: 443:quic,p=1


Stefan Caunter
Hamilton, Canada

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Jude DaShiell <address@hidden> wrote:
> Well, if someone tries reading gmail using lynx and security level on their
> account is set to high, lynx will not be allowed access since it hasn't got
> all of the modern security equipment installed in google chrome.
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, David Woolley wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:59:25
>> From: David Woolley <address@hidden>
>> To: address@hidden
>> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] Getting the "Forbidden" error message
>> On 30/06/15 21:29, Shel Talmy wrote:
>>> Hi, via google, acknowledge this has been going on for years, and it's
>>> happening to me increasingly.
>>> I'm using LYNX 2.87, which apart from from the above, works fine.
>>> Please tell me what to do to correct this, and thanks.
>> If you are being asked for a password, supply the right one.  Otherwise it
>> is likely to be a legal question, rather than a technical one, i.e. is there
>> any legal reason why the servers should not refuse to talk to Lynx, and if
>> so, are you prepared to take the operators to court.
>> In many cases of discrimination against Lynx, using the user Agent string
>> for a recent IE or Mozilla may get round the block, but the site may then
>> serve web applications that only works on those browsers.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lynx-dev mailing list
>> address@hidden
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Lynx-dev mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]