[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx2.8.7pre.4

From: David Woolley
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx2.8.7pre.4
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 22:18:11 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20090302)

Thorsten Glaser wrote:

If this means what I think it does, I'm strongly against this option's
new default. Lynx should send a user agent by default, for example so

Agreed. Amongst other things, unless it does, Lynx will score a flat zero in browser user statistics, reinforcing the argument that it can be totally ignored.

that people see it's actually used or can optimise for it. The ability
to turn it off is good only in corner cases, like pages that misunder-
stand the "optimise" bit above.

Sending no User-Agent header is sufficiently unusual, that I think there is a real risk that servers will start discriminating against such browsers.

David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]