[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lynx-dev] urg: looking for statically linked binary of lynx, please

From: Y P
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] urg: looking for statically linked binary of lynx, please help!
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:41:21 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

Thanx anyway,
will look after other static bins (elinks, links2).

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:38:07PM +0000, David Woolley wrote:
> Y P wrote:
> >Hi:
> >
> >On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 08:07:49AM +0000, David Woolley wrote:
> >>Seems to me that you can use a dynamically linked version, as long as 
> >>you have an appropriate LDLIBRARYPATH.  
> >
> >I don't know ! I'm webmaster, not the server-admin. I don't know so much
> >about rpm-based sysstems, I don't use such myself at home.
> LDLIBRARYPATH has nothing to do with RPMs.  Its fundamental to Unix 
> shared libraries.
> >
> >>Even if there wwe some reason 
> >>why you couldn't have shared objects, you could static link private 
> >>libraries and dynamic link system ones.
> >
> >The system doesn't authorizes to have a personalized .htaccess for Apache,
> >and so more, so I won't ask them what -except paying enough for
> .htaccess has nothing to do with whether you use .so or .a libraries.
> Generally though, I doubt that there is a sufficient demand for static 
> linked versions of Lynx, for anyone to have one available for download 
> for your platform.
> -- 
> David Woolley
> Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
> RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
> that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.

-- : 
Micro$oft has a majority market share in the new desktop PC marketplace.
This is a bug, which Ubuntu is designed to fix ! 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]