[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Lynx-dev] Re: "lynx -child" implies "-restrictions=disk_save"

From: Andrew Belov
Subject: [Lynx-dev] Re: "lynx -child" implies "-restrictions=disk_save"
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:10:43 +0400 (MSD)

On Jun 17, 2007 at 04:36:48, Thomas Dickey wrote:

>> if (child_lynx == FALSE && no_mail == FALSE && local_host_only
>> == FALSE)
>> It seems logical as long as file-saving is disallowed, but if we choose
>> to do away with implied restrictions for "-child", then the check for
>> child_lynx==FALSE should be lifted.
> or perhaps make "-child" also set no_mail

OK, so if the restrictions are traditional, there is some sense in that.
The attached patch sets both no_disk_save and no_mail explicitly for
"-child" and cleans up the code so that child_lynx is only checked for
in handle_prev_DOC().

Attachment: 2.8.6rel.5-child_relaxed.patch
Description: Binary data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]