[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev dev.10 progress

From: Thomas E. Dickey
Subject: Re: lynx-dev dev.10 progress
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 05:06:46 -0500 (EST)

On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Leonid Pauzner wrote:

> 24-Nov-2002 19:15 Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:43:28PM +0300, Leonid Pauzner wrote:
> >> 19-Nov-2002 21:01 Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >>
> >> > It's something to do with the pool-allocation.  valgrind is probably 
> >> > showing
> >> > me the problem that I'm looking for, e.g., this (repeated a lot of 
> >> > times):
> >>
> >> Still I cannot figure the source of problems with line->date .
> > I have an idea about it (perhaps a mistaken sense of how the pool logic
> > works),
> > but haven't found time to debug it yet.  This has been one of those months
> > where lots of programs are broken, so the ones that I've been working on are
> > the ones where the broken code is already released.
> When in lack of time, it may be reasonable to release dev10 shortly
> by postponing pool changes to dev11 cycle (it is just an optimization
> after all).

I may do that next weekend.  For the moment I put my dev.10e patch in, which has the first draft of changes
to make the compiled-in pathnames configurable.  (I wrote that, made
some small tests to it, but got distracted with the other issue).  For
dev.10 though, I have the color bug that DK reported (and proposed a
patch for), and one fix for file-upload.

> No, diff -u -p works fine in most cases (sometimes it gets confused by
> #if #else; no problem with PUBLIC or PRIVATE).

I tried it with those options, but the resulting patch was no different.

T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>

; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]