[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx vs. links vs. elinks?
From: |
Thomas E. Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx vs. links vs. elinks? |
Date: |
Wed, 22 May 2002 12:23:51 -0400 (EDT) |
On 22 May 2002, clemensF wrote:
> just curious. lynx can be trusted to cover the entire kuddelmuddel called
> "world wide web". it is well represented by Thomas Dickey. links is now
> what many hope for: browsing in text-mode and also capable of
> javascript and graphics, running native code for each platform, of which
> are many. elinks has no javascript, but lua and is very alive under
> professional-class development.
you appear to be referring to w3m (the javascript support still appears to
be pre-alpha). The graphics are interesting (a little fragile though).
> Mikulas Patocka is for links, Petr "pasky" Baudis for elinks. there are
> other projects whose goal is "good surfing":
>
> Dillo Web Browser :: Home Page, small, graphical
> http://dillo.cipsga.org.br/
(at least they put dates in their changelog - compare with elinks ;-)
> there's also netrik, text mode browser with ecma javascript
> http://netrik.sourceforge.net/
netrik is (based on actual code to advertisements) about 95% vaporware.
> my questions:
>
> x. do the people named in this document cooperate actively?
probably not (they have different goals)
> x. will we see a cross ported version of the best of links <-> elinks?
it's too soon to tell if elinks will become links, or if one will be
abandoned... (I put a copy of elinks on one of my machines, but the
quality was not noticeably improved).
--
T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden