[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.4 with OpenSSL
|
From: |
Thomas E. Dickey |
|
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.4 with OpenSSL |
|
Date: |
Thu, 8 Feb 2001 09:25:32 -0500 (EST) |
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001 address@hidden wrote:
> In a recent note, Thomas E. Dickey said:
>
> > Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 07:17:26 -0500 (EST)
> >
> > actually, what I've done (in my pending changes) is to define another
> > symbol my_srand to srand/srandom/srand48, since redefining one of the
> ^^^^^^^^
> How about LY_srand? Just a suggestion. Or are you looking to
> a wider scope of portability?
well, generally I do try to reuse the configure-script macros (I've
about 250, 10% or so are specific to one program). Perhaps a parameter
to the macro to define the prefix would work better.
--
T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.4 with OpenSSL, Patrick Ash , 2001/02/03
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.4 with OpenSSL, Ilya Zakharevich, 2001/02/03
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.4 with OpenSSL, Patrick Ash , 2001/02/08
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.4 with OpenSSL, Thomas E. Dickey, 2001/02/08
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.4 with OpenSSL, pg, 2001/02/08
- Re: lynx-dev Lynx 2.8.4 with OpenSSL,
Thomas E. Dickey <=
- lynx-dev rejection of lynx by website, Leslie Fairall, 2001/02/08
- Re: lynx-dev rejection of lynx by website, Thomas Dickey, 2001/02/08
- Re: lynx-dev rejection of lynx by website, Leslie Fairall, 2001/02/08
- Re: lynx-dev rejection of lynx by website, Thomas Dickey, 2001/02/08
- Re: lynx-dev rejection of lynx by website, David Woolley, 2001/02/08
- Re: lynx-dev rejection of lynx by website, David Woolley, 2001/02/08
- Re: lynx-dev rejection of lynx by website, Larry W. Virden, 2001/02/19