[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8
From: |
pg |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8 |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 08:56:28 -0600 (MDT) |
In a recent note, Thomas E. Dickey said:
> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:16:22 -0400 (EDT)
>
> > Hastily composed; poorly tested; integrate only if needed.
>
I meant that part. Probably won't even compile with ncurses.
I'll rework. Does ncurses imply resizeterm(), or should I
test separately for resizeterm?
It might have been the putenv()s that interfere with ncurses.
I'll also try #ifdef around them.
> well, it's the beginning of a new cycle, so I'll find time to test some.
> (it's the ones at the end, to close out a patch that tend to be a
> problem).
>
I know I submitted my patch late, after you had announced close out.
I pretty much expected it to go to dev.9. I guess I got a free
alpha test. :-(
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, Thomas Dickey, 2000/08/24
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, pg, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, Thomas Dickey, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, pg, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, Thomas E. Dickey, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8,
pg <=
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, Thomas E. Dickey, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, pg, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, Thomas E. Dickey, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, pg, 2000/08/25
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.8, Thomas E. Dickey, 2000/08/25