[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lynx-specific tags? (Was: Re: lynx-dev Using other HTML parsers in L
From: |
Vlad Harchev |
Subject: |
Re: Lynx-specific tags? (Was: Re: lynx-dev Using other HTML parsers in Lynx) |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 11:48:43 +0500 (SAMST) |
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Mooneer Salem wrote:
> Also, by the way, are there any Lynx-specific HTML tags in
> existance? Would it increase the user base if we "invent"
> a few tags that'll only work in Lynx and get Web designers to use
> them? (Well, Microsoft's did this too with IE... :)
See WWW/Library/Implementation/HTMLDTD.c for a set of tags and their
attributes supported by lynx. In general, it handles some ancient (and
even deprecated) tags (like LINK) in a original way - look in src/HTML.c
Best regards,
-Vlad
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- lynx-dev Using other HTML parsers in Lynx, Mooneer Salem, 2000/07/25
- Re: lynx-dev Using other HTML parsers in Lynx, pAb-032871, 2000/07/26
- Re: lynx-dev Using other HTML parsers in Lynx, Mooneer Salem, 2000/07/26
- Re: lynx-dev Using other HTML parsers in Lynx, Vlad Harchev, 2000/07/27
- Lynx-specific tags? (Was: Re: lynx-dev Using other HTML parsers in Lynx), Mooneer Salem, 2000/07/27
- lynx-dev No Need For Proprietary Markup, Mark Canlas, 2000/07/27
- Re: Lynx-specific tags? (Was: Re: lynx-dev Using other HTML parsers in Lynx), pAb-032871, 2000/07/28
- Re: Lynx-specific tags? (Was: Re: lynx-dev Using other HTML parsers in Lynx),
Vlad Harchev <=
- lynx-dev LINK is NOT ancient, Mark Canlas, 2000/07/28
- Re: lynx-dev LINK is NOT ancient, David Woolley, 2000/07/30
- Re: Lynx-specific tags? (Was: Re: lynx-dev Using other HTML parsers in Lynx), David Woolley, 2000/07/29