[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.5

From: Thomas E. Dickey
Subject: Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.5
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:58:00 -0400 (EDT)

On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 address@hidden wrote:

> I didn't get it.  Is everything in the archive?  If not, I'd appreciate a
> repost of anything that's missing.

I haven't seen it yet, either.  iirc, we've had a couple of times where
I post the changes late on Sunday and it doesn't propagate very quickly.

>     * add os390 item to $host_os case-statement in -PG
> Thanks.  But I don't see this reflected in configure.  Did you run autoconf?

duh - no.  I was up too late, I see (sorry).
>     * move $host_os case-statement in before some configuration 
> tests
>       such as CF_BUNDLED_INTL which might perform compile-time tests -TD
> Again, thanks.  But I fear this is insufficient.  Since the case branch sets 
> the
> default name of the compiler to "c89" instead of "cc", it must be performed
> before AC_PROG_CC.  The MKS patches actually modify AC_PROG_CC to search for
> "c89" before "cc".  This is good POSIX/XOpen.

ok - I'll have to revisit this, then.  This is the only one where you want
to force the compiler to be different; probably I should put c89 into the
AC_PROG_CC macro's search list (though thinking about it, I can recall
that introduces problems with some platforms - using c89 would preset
definitions that broke the POSIX headers)

> -- gil

T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>

; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]