[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev SOURCE_CACHE "problem" - proposal of SOURCE_CACHE_FOR_INCOM
Re: lynx-dev SOURCE_CACHE "problem" - proposal of SOURCE_CACHE_FOR_INCOMPLETE
Sat, 8 Apr 2000 18:18:44 -0500 (CDT)
On Sat, 8 Apr 2000, Vlad Harchev wrote:
> I don't understand how new setting would be done as suboption, if we want to
> preserve backward compatibility. Please give me hints.
> We can't just allow things like
> - syntax doesn't allow this or will require a very intensive code changes
> and will just confuse users more than one additional option
> Also, I wonder - what's the difference for the user between suboption and
> new option? We have to document both.
Less top-level options.
Re: lynx-dev SOURCE_CACHE "problem" - proposal of SOURCE_CACHE_FOR_INCOMPLETE, Henry Nelson, 2000/04/08