[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.x - 'special URLs' anti-spoofing protection is wea
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.x - 'special URLs' anti-spoofing protection is weak |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 1999 15:13:16 -0500 (EST) |
> Actually, I forgot about the third nasty he finds, buffer overruns:
there's fewer of them now, but probably impossible to remove all (if we
can reproduce this one, we'll remove it).
> > > 1a) Well but how many of those title comparisons are really in some way
> > > "security" relevant? I.e. what exactly depends on the right outcome?
> >
> > he's saying that all of them are (of course).
>
> So does your "(of course)" mean that you agree with him? Or the opposite?
> :)
neither - "of course" he finds a wide scope on the problem he is complaining
about.
> Klaus
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.x - 'special URLs' anti-spoofing protection is weak, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.x - 'special URLs' anti-spoofing protection is weak,
T.E.Dickey <=