[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Documentation requirements: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:

From: Larry W. Virden
Subject: Documentation requirements: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:07:29 -0500 (EST)

From: Philip Webb <address@hidden>
991119 Klaus Weide wrote: 
>>PW> a good point, provided it is documented somewhere,
>>PW> but it isn't: not in Users Guide or Supported URLs.
>KW> let the inventor of LYNXCFG: do it... :)
PW>yes, if we all accept that authors of features & their modifications
PW>should be required to document them (allowing for language difficulties),
PW>but i hesitate to ask TD to take on the task of doing the requiring.

Tom, I won't hesitate to at least _ask_ your opinion - what do you
think about the idea that before a new or changed feature is accepted
requiring the contributor also provide documentation?
Larry W. Virden                 <URL: mailto:address@hidden>
<URL:> <*> O- 
Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should 
be construed as representing my employer's opinions.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]