[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Documentation requirements: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:
From: |
Larry W. Virden |
Subject: |
Documentation requirements: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS: |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:07:29 -0500 (EST) |
From: Philip Webb <address@hidden>
991119 Klaus Weide wrote:
>>PW> a good point, provided it is documented somewhere,
>>PW> but it isn't: not in Users Guide or Supported URLs.
>KW> let the inventor of LYNXCFG: do it... :)
PW>yes, if we all accept that authors of features & their modifications
PW>should be required to document them (allowing for language difficulties),
PW>but i hesitate to ask TD to take on the task of doing the requiring.
Tom, I won't hesitate to at least _ask_ your opinion - what do you
think about the idea that before a new or changed feature is accepted
requiring the contributor also provide documentation?
--
Larry W. Virden <URL: mailto:address@hidden>
<URL: http://www.purl.org/NET/lvirden/> <*> O-
Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should
be construed as representing my employer's opinions.
-><-
- Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS: (was: something wrong with LYNXKEYMAP), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/18
- Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:, Philip Webb, 1999/11/19
- Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:, Klaus Weide, 1999/11/19
- Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:, Philip Webb, 1999/11/19
- Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:, Klaus Weide, 1999/11/19
- Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:, Philip Webb, 1999/11/19
- Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:, Klaus Weide, 1999/11/19
- Documentation requirements: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:,
Larry W. Virden <=
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Leonid Pauzner, 1999/11/19