[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:
From: |
Klaus Weide |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS: |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 1999 08:13:04 -0600 (CST) |
On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, Philip Webb wrote:
> lynxcfg: works for me.
Well, typing in 'g HtTp://localhost/' works, too. But "http:" is still
the canonical form (and lynx canonicalizes it), and "LYNXCFG:" is the
canonical form for the LYNXCFG scheme, whereas "lynxcgi:" is the canonical
form for the lynxcgi scheme.
> > Supported URLs makes the destinction
> > "lynx...:" - documented individually some way
> > vs. "LYNX...:" documented only summarily as "internal URLs".
>
> is THAT distinction documented ... (grin)?
What, do all documents have to have a "How To Read This Document"
section? (And do they then also have to have a "How To Read The 'How
To Read This Document' Section" section?) :)
It seems obvious to me that after
The lynxexec and lynxprog URLs:
and
The lynxcgi URL:
the heading
The LYNXfoo internal URLs:
means something like "internal URLs, which we choose to capitalize in
order to distinguish them from the other ones".
> i've added a line to LHFB to cover lynxcompileopts: .
> my vote is to have both in the Options Forms Page
> -- what did we agree we should call it? -- ,
The thread died...
Klaus
- Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS: (was: something wrong with LYNXKEYMAP), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/18
- Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:, Philip Webb, 1999/11/19
- Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:, Klaus Weide, 1999/11/19
- Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:, Philip Webb, 1999/11/19
- Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:,
Klaus Weide <=
- Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:, Philip Webb, 1999/11/19
- Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:, Klaus Weide, 1999/11/19
- Documentation requirements: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:, Larry W. Virden, 1999/11/19
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Leonid Pauzner, 1999/11/19