[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev "soft newline" and source searching (was: another largish p
Re: lynx-dev "soft newline" and source searching (was: another largish patch)
Tue, 26 Oct 1999 08:16:45 -0500 (CDT)
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, T.E.Dickey wrote:
> > If you want "foobar" to be found in that situation, you have to
> > extend the search mechanism. Not a small fix.
> > Or don't break lines like that, restore the old lynx behavior.
> the old lynx behavior didn't wrap lines
...in source view.
That's what I meant. You couldn't see everything (except by doing a
'P'rint), but you could "find" everything: at least go to the right
line that has the target string, even if the target string is not
(or is not completely) in the displayed part of the line.
> (there's probably a better way to
> implement it, agreed).
It's a trade off, I don't see how changing some details of
implementation would change that.
If folks want a search function that covers more than one line, someone
should write it. (or avoid having lines split, as in "old lynx behavior"
with the resulting effects.)