[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev cpp portabliity question

From: Vlad Harchev
Subject: Re: lynx-dev cpp portabliity question
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 18:09:22 +0500 (SAMST)

On Fri, 15 Oct 1999, T.E.Dickey wrote:

> >  What syntax error you are talking about? gcc handles this as expected, the 
> > result is 'x+x' (the ANSI spec says this is a correct behaviour, and most 
> > obvious incorrect behaviour is infinite loop). 
> as given, you have an incomplete statement (what's "x" in this context).

   OK, what about following code:
int main(int argc,char** argv)
        int x=3;
#define x x+x
        return x;
   I'm interested on how many compilers will hang on/reject such code.
   The message subject was "cpp portablity"  thou' :)

> > > > #define x x+x   
> > > > x   
> -- 
> Thomas E. Dickey
> address@hidden

 Best regards,

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]