[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Most users' experience (was: 2.8.3dev.8 patch 3...)
From: |
Klaus Weide |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Most users' experience (was: 2.8.3dev.8 patch 3...) |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Sep 1999 20:47:18 -0500 (CDT) |
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Webmaster Jim wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 1999 at 03:56:06PM -0400, Gregory A Lundberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 07, 1999 at 02:37:34PM -0500, Klaus Weide wrote:
> > > I dare say that's most lynx users' experience... It seems you are having
> > > some display problems - [...]
>
> I'll throw in my $0.02: my experience has been that Lynx works on
> every UNIX system I've tried without any of the funny behaviour you
> mentioned. I've had great success with SCO, HPUX, NetBSD, FreeBSD, DEC
> UNIX, SGI, oh, and SunOS. I also understand how to set TERM, which helps
> :-)
Of course I meant to write "that's NOT most users' experience..."
I'm sure I did, sendmail must have eaten it. :)
Klaus
2.8.3dev.8 patch 3 (was: lynx-dev RFC959 non-compliance), Klaus Weide, 1999/09/07
Re: 2.8.3dev.8 patch 3 (was: lynx-dev RFC959 non-compliance), Klaus Weide, 1999/09/07
Re: 2.8.3dev.8 patch 3 (was: lynx-dev RFC959 non-compliance), Gregory A Lundberg, 1999/09/08
Re: 2.8.3dev.8 patch 3 (was: lynx-dev RFC959 non-compliance), Klaus Weide, 1999/09/10
Re: 2.8.3dev.8 patch 3 (was: lynx-dev RFC959 non-compliance), Gregory A Lundberg, 1999/09/10
Re: lynx-dev RFC959 non-compliance in Lynx hangs the client, Klaus Weide, 1999/09/07