[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Re: NNN <something-or-nothing>
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Re: NNN <something-or-nothing> |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Mar 1999 05:45:58 -0500 (EST) |
990302 Kim DeVaughn wrote:
> 990302 Klaus Weide suggested re the fgp debate:
>> make just plain 123 a configurable shortcut to one of them.
>> 123 = 123 f - current behavior
>> 123 = 123 g - what some people want
>> 123 = 123 p - why not, for someone who thinks in terms of pages
>> 123 = 123 X - for the new function X no-one has yet thought of
> I like it. Generalizing is usually always a Good Thing ...!
yes, it's another step along the Great Road:
however, we'all (the rest of us) should respect the fact
that it will probably be LE who does the actual work, if it gets done;
i hope our enthusiasm isn't irritating her (smile).
one of these days, i'm going to try a bit of programming myself ...
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
- Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Laura Eaves, 1999/03/01
- lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/01
- Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Philip Webb, 1999/03/02
- Re: lynx-dev syntax change - f not g, Klaus Weide, 1999/03/02
- lynx-dev Re: syntax change - f not g, Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/02
- Re: lynx-dev syntax change - f not g, Philip Webb, 1999/03/02
- Re: lynx-dev syntax change - f not g, Klaus Weide, 1999/03/02
- Re: lynx-dev syntax change - hidden links digression, Klaus Weide, 1999/03/02
- lynx-dev NNN <something-or-nothing> (was: syntax change), Klaus Weide, 1999/03/02
- lynx-dev Re: NNN <something-or-nothing> (was: syntax change), Kim DeVaughn, 1999/03/02
- Re: lynx-dev Re: NNN <something-or-nothing>,
Philip Webb <=
Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, Henry Nelson, 1999/03/01
Re: lynx-dev Re: syntax change, dickey, 1999/03/01