Re: lynx-dev syntax change

[Philip Webb]

990301 Jacob Poon wrote: 
> On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Philip Webb wrote:
>> maybe you don't touch-type: up to the number keys is a natural movement,
>> but  -  &  +  are a stretch &  +  needs shifting:
> This is true if everybody uses US (or similar) keyboard layout.  However,
> when using other keyboards (eg: Germany, Italy, Latin America),
> you do not need to hold the Shift key to access the '+' on typewriter keys.

yes, i've realised we're getting into an area with many personal variables.
 
> If you want to enter links quickly and frequently for navigating links,
> a better way is to put one hand on the keypad (for entering numbers),
> and another on the typewriter keys (to handle link type).

but that's not the touch-typing stance ...

> Actually, it is more of an algebraic issue than calculus one. :)
 
i hope i haven't misinterpreted your earlier message,
which appeared to drop support for  0+1g  (if you ever supported it).
KD's point -- that  1+g  &  1g+  can be valid simultaneously --
hopefully solves the problem for everyone: she or LE just have to do it.

-- 
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT     ___________//___,  Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT    `-O----------O---'  University of Toronto