Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx2.8.2dev.12d.patch.gz

[dickey]

> 
> On Fri, Jan 01, 1999, address@hidden (address@hidden) said: 
> | 
> | > Don't forget to update the Lynx patch number and date before pushing 12d 
> | > out as dev.13 . 
> | 
> | PRCS does that automatically.  So the actual dev.13 will get whatever 
> | date I check it in.  (I may remember to update the CHANGES file though). 
>  
> Speaking of the CHANGES doc ... is there any significance to line items 
> that begin with a + "bullet", over the majority, which begin with a * 
> "bullet" ...? 

no - I meant to change those to '*', for consistency with older items.
but when editing, I usually make it a '+' because vile's formatter wants
to make the '*' replicated on following lines (since the default formatting
rules assume C-style comments).

so it's just a minor (from my point of view) typo that I usually fix on
the next patch (like trimming trailing blanks).

> /kim 


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey